I'm sorry if this topic has been done to death, but I don't think I could even look at the game if it was 4e. I would be sick to my stomach.
I was thinking it over, and I believe that it would be impossible to obtain 3e or 3.5e because WotSC is trying to drown out the Pathfinder competition. Thank goodness Pathfinder is holding its own, because I hate 4e.
I suppose overhaul might be able to get something going with Paizo. I might be able to play BG3 with Pathfinder rules, but it would still take some serious consideration--I would have to argue myself into it. Becayse if I wanted to play 3.5e I'd play NWN.
Speculation: I wonder if WotSC is the reason Bioware got away from DND rules in the first place?
IMHO, 2e is the only way to go for any BG game. Don't get me wrong, I like IWD2, but I couldn't stand how much 3rd edition nerfed the ranger and the paladin. Again, sick to my stomach.
Any thoughts?
I was thinking it over, and I believe that it would be impossible to obtain 3e or 3.5e because WotSC is trying to drown out the Pathfinder competition. Thank goodness Pathfinder is holding its own, because I hate 4e.
I suppose overhaul might be able to get something going with Paizo. I might be able to play BG3 with Pathfinder rules, but it would still take some serious consideration--I would have to argue myself into it. Becayse if I wanted to play 3.5e I'd play NWN.
Speculation: I wonder if WotSC is the reason Bioware got away from DND rules in the first place?
IMHO, 2e is the only way to go for any BG game. Don't get me wrong, I like IWD2, but I couldn't stand how much 3rd edition nerfed the ranger and the paladin. Again, sick to my stomach.
Any thoughts?