Hello. Moderately skilled player here (and that's being generous). Very much a role player, and I have a distinct hatred of dual/multi class. Not that it's relevant to my question, but that's my taste.
I've beaten the trilogy with a monk and shapeshifter (my favorite class), and a Hal-elven archer with x-bow. I've beaten the first game with a handful of classes, and have beaten soa with a cleric of helm and a dragon disciple (who incidentally became my tank, oddly - I didn't end up playing home like a classic caster).
So I'm interested in doing a trilogy run with one of two classes I've never really done more than goof off with briefly, the inquisitor or the mage (probably wild).
What are the opinions on the best prospect for a trilogy run? I know both can be considered op to the point of almost broken, so I know they are powerful. But I'd like opinions on play styles, opinions on scale, anything useful to making a decision for a trilogy run. There will be reloads aplenty, and always a full party.
Thank you very much in advance to anyone who replies.
I've beaten the trilogy with a monk and shapeshifter (my favorite class), and a Hal-elven archer with x-bow. I've beaten the first game with a handful of classes, and have beaten soa with a cleric of helm and a dragon disciple (who incidentally became my tank, oddly - I didn't end up playing home like a classic caster).
So I'm interested in doing a trilogy run with one of two classes I've never really done more than goof off with briefly, the inquisitor or the mage (probably wild).
What are the opinions on the best prospect for a trilogy run? I know both can be considered op to the point of almost broken, so I know they are powerful. But I'd like opinions on play styles, opinions on scale, anything useful to making a decision for a trilogy run. There will be reloads aplenty, and always a full party.
Thank you very much in advance to anyone who replies.