How will a reviewer approach reviewing enhanced edition of baldurs gate?
The way I see it, there are a few mutually exclusive approaches:
1. Judge the whole release. That means that supposing all the new changes are rubbish/meh, the games should still recieve a high review score, since the game includes all the original BG gameplay, and the game was almost universally critically acclaimed.
2. The exact opposite: Review only the enhanced edition changes - If the new content is rubbish/meh then the game gets a very low score
3. Judge it as a re-release: Is it just a cash grab? Does the game merit re-releasing - are the updates enough to justify the game's re-release?
4.Who is the intended audience of the review?
How do the graphics of the game compare to a $20 game you might expect to be released today - is the game really playable by people who didn't play it originally? Is BG essentially a bad or obstructive game by todays standards?
Similarly, is the game recommended to people who already own the originals? Is there enough new content to justify buying the game again?
5. Platform specific. The game might end up scoring a 10/10 on the iPad, since it would blow the competition out of the water, but get a much lower score on the PC, where the competition is higher.
These are just some of the examples I can think of, which would potentially make the game difficult to evaluate with just a quick glance at it's meta critic score, and just reading a review on a website wouldn't necessarily tell you because the reviewer is possibly going to be judging the game to a different standard and to a different audience than you.
So my question is to all the people on these forums who are waiting for the game to release before deciding whether to buy it is: How do you intend to evaluate the finished product as being a worthy/unworthy purchase?
I'm not that interested in answers along the lines of "I just want to see if feature X is included and then I'll get it", but more in the people who are genuinely undecided about whether getting the game is going to be worthwhile.
The way I see it, there are a few mutually exclusive approaches:
1. Judge the whole release. That means that supposing all the new changes are rubbish/meh, the games should still recieve a high review score, since the game includes all the original BG gameplay, and the game was almost universally critically acclaimed.
2. The exact opposite: Review only the enhanced edition changes - If the new content is rubbish/meh then the game gets a very low score
3. Judge it as a re-release: Is it just a cash grab? Does the game merit re-releasing - are the updates enough to justify the game's re-release?
4.Who is the intended audience of the review?
How do the graphics of the game compare to a $20 game you might expect to be released today - is the game really playable by people who didn't play it originally? Is BG essentially a bad or obstructive game by todays standards?
Similarly, is the game recommended to people who already own the originals? Is there enough new content to justify buying the game again?
5. Platform specific. The game might end up scoring a 10/10 on the iPad, since it would blow the competition out of the water, but get a much lower score on the PC, where the competition is higher.
These are just some of the examples I can think of, which would potentially make the game difficult to evaluate with just a quick glance at it's meta critic score, and just reading a review on a website wouldn't necessarily tell you because the reviewer is possibly going to be judging the game to a different standard and to a different audience than you.
So my question is to all the people on these forums who are waiting for the game to release before deciding whether to buy it is: How do you intend to evaluate the finished product as being a worthy/unworthy purchase?
I'm not that interested in answers along the lines of "I just want to see if feature X is included and then I'll get it", but more in the people who are genuinely undecided about whether getting the game is going to be worthwhile.